The review process for papers submitted to Conference Proceedings is designed to ensure that all published content meets high standards of scientific quality and relevance. Here’s an overview of how the review process works:
Peer Review Process
- Submission to Proceedings Editors: Papers are submitted directly to the proceedings editors, who manage the review process.
- Review Criteria: The review process assesses papers based on criteria such as significance, relevance, originality, scientific/technical quality, organization, completeness, acknowledgment, and formalities. Reviewers evaluate whether the work is well-structured, clearly presented, and contributes meaningfully to the field.
- Feedback and Revisions: Based on reviewer feedback, papers may be accepted as is, accepted with major or minor changes, or rejected. Authors will be given the opportunity to revise their work based on feedback before final acceptance.
Key Aspects of the Review Process
- Community and Conference Expectations: Proceedings editors review papers in accordance with the conference expectations and scope.
- No Copyediting or Typesetting: we do not copyedit or typeset papers. Therefore, authors must ensure their manuscripts are thoroughly checked and in their final form before submission.
- Importance of Timely Revisions: Authors should respond promptly to revision requests to avoid delays in publication.